1) It took less than $1 billion and no USA lives to capture/kill Saddam. It is the rebuilding and securing Iraq – work Obama does not want to do in Libya – that cost us all the money.
2) If killing this dictator was the mission in Libya, then why was it not done within the first few weeks of the mission via USA-NATO air strike which would – according to Obama fans – help Libyans avoid all the pain brought to them in recent month by this conflict? O, my mistake: By removing Gaddafi without trying to back or install a new normal leadership, Libyans will suffer greatly as seen in recent months… in Egypt; one of our “great successes” of recent years.
3) When the leader of Yemen and other places will ultimately fall, will Obama take credit for it or will he be sent a memo that his inactions pro-longed the lethal uprisings in the Middle East?
4) Only 44% in a Rasmussen Poll now approve of Obama’s work in Libya. This is the reason why Obama needs so desperately go take credit for things that happen around the world: people see these events as taking place despite Obama and not due to Obama, and the public has little interest to give him much credit for it, so he goes out there like a little boy screaming and yelling “give me credit; give me credit.”
5) You saw this picture? I mean, when did Obama change his mind from saying hello to Gaddafi to taking credit for a twenty year old boy shooting him?
- Obama and Gaddafi in 2009 – Pic by Reuters
