Category Archives: Obama - Page 2

Video: Obama Forgets Justice Ginsburg’s Middle and Last Name at Recent WH Event

When President Obama welcomed the guests to the Hanukkah event at the White House last Thursday afternoon, he totally forgot the full name of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is Jewish.

Said Obama while looking around the room: “We are honored to be joined by… one of the Justice of the Supreme Court Ruth.” At this moment the President made a move with his forehead and eyes saying “ah…” and then looked down at his papers and said “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is here.”

This of course is worse than when Texas Governor Perry who was clearly referring to a specific 8-1 ruling said “eight unelected Justices,” nor is the same as when Perry said “Not Montemayor,” knowing clearly that he does not have the correct name of Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Here is the video:

Video: President Confuses Texas and Kansas

When Obama was in the pacific recently, he said he is in Asia. When he was in Australia, the President was confused which day it was. Today in Kansas the President gave a big shout out to Texas, but within seconds – after the crowd broke into laughter of Obama’s Obama-like gaffes – he corrected himself.

Video: Obama Says Name of his Book is From Jeremiah Wright’s Sermon

The Daily Caller Reports: Video obtained exclusively by The Daily Caller shows Illinois Senator Barack  Obama, then campaigning for Democrats before the 2006 midterm elections,  praising Reverend Jeremiah Wright and telling an audience that he “stole” the  title of his book “The Audacity of Hope” from Wright’s sermon of the same name,  which he “loved.” Obama also referred to Wright as “my pastor.”

“I’m not plugging the book, but the title of it, ‘The Audacity of Hope.’ Some people have noticed that I actually used that line in the speech that I  gave at the 2004 Democratic Convention,” Obama said on November 4, 2006 in  Bristol, Pa., at a rally in support of Patrick Murphy, who went on to serve two  terms in Congress. ”But I tell you what: I’m confessing to all of you here  today — it’s a big crowd, 2,000 people — I’m confessing in front of the TV  cameras: I actually stole this line from my pastor, Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.”

Video: Stewart Pokes Fox for Attacking Obama Over ‘God’ in Thanksgiving Address

Mediaite Reports: With a week off to celebrate Thanksgiving, Jon Stewart returned tonight with some orders of business to discuss– among them President Obama’s Thanksgiving address, which irritated some on Fox News for having omitted mention of God. Looking at the coverage of it, Stewart found that Fox even turned to a priest to discuss the matter, while only mentioning in passing that other Presidents had done so in the past, and that the President actually did mention God in his written address.

Video: Obama’s Week in Review

Click the headline of this post to see a six-minute video of the President’s previous seven days ending Wednesday afternoon.

Video: Obama’s Weekly/Thanksgiving Address

President Obama gave his weekly address two days earlier due to Thanksgiving. Em, actually the President records his weekly address on Thursday or Friday many times but its official release time is Saturday. However, again, due to Thanksgiving, it is out a few days earlier. I wonder how many people actually watch these weekly clips, but… here it is:

Obama Tells Sharpton Religious Faith Gives Him Hope Republicans Will Raise Taxes on Upper Income Americans, Corporations

ABC News Reports: President Obama spoke to the Rev. Al Sharpton for his syndicated radio show.

Sharpton, who has a show on MSNBC, asked the president for his response to the supercommittee announcing it had reached a deadlock.

“Look, there’s no doubt that I’m disappointed that not just Congress generally, but the Republicans in particular, are not willing to put serious revenue on the table as part of a balanced plan,” the president responded. “You know, this is something very straight forward, and you understand it, Al. We’ve got to get our budget under control. And there are basically two ways of doing it.

“One, which the Republicans are proposing, is you just cut — education, you cut science, you cut Medicare, you put more of a burden on people who can least afford it,” the president continued.

“Or, alternatively, you make some prudent cuts, selective cuts in programs that don’t work anymore,” he said. “You make some modifications in things that can work better, but then you also ask people like you and me who can afford it to pay a little bit more in our taxes. You get rid of the Bush tax cuts, you make sure the millionaires and billionaires are paying their fair share, and if you do it that way then everybody benefits. The economy’s stronger, markets have more confidence. Ironically, business and the wealthy would actually do better if the economy was stronger.

“So the position they’re taking is short-sighted,” the president continued. “But, you know,…it must be my religious faith, Reverend, ’cause, hope springs eternal and I continue to believe that at some point common sense will prevail and we’ll be able to work something out.”

Former Obama Fundraiser Rezko Gets 10 years; Already Served Almsot Four of it

Reuters Reports:  U.S. judge on Tuesday sentenced Antoin “Tony” Rezko, a former Chicago  fundraiser for President Barack Obama, to 10-1/2 years in prison for corruption  and extortion.

Rezko’s conviction was among a slew of guilty pleas that led to the  conviction in two trials of former Democratic Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich  and several of his aides.

A Syrian immigrant who earned millions in the real estate and restaurant businesses, Rezko has been imprisoned since his 2008 conviction on 16 fraud and attempted bribery counts.

“Enough is enough. Corruption in Illinois has to stop,” U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve in handing down sentence to the now-gaunt, 56-year-old Rezko.

Rezko became a minor campaign issue for Obama during the 2008 presidential race. The two had become close friends and Rezko had raised tens of thousands of dollars for the then-Illinois state senator’s successful U.S. Senate and presidential campaigns.

At one point, the Republican National Committee referred to Rezko as Obama’s “money man”.

Rezko also advised Obama in the purchase of the future president’s large home on the south side of Chicago. Rezko’s wife purchased and then resold to the Obama family a side yard to the home they could not afford initially. When Rezko was convicted, Obama said he was “saddened” and added, “This isn’t
the Tony Rezko I knew.”

Because he has spent some 44 months in prison — some in solitary confinement awaiting a chance to testify that never came — Rezko has roughly 6 years, 10 months, left to serve.

Oops: State Dept. Botches Map of Disputed Kashmir Region

Days after the Defense Secretary said that India is a threat to the USA, we have this reports from ABC: Unlike Rick Perry’s “oops,” this one could have geopolitical consequences.

The U.S. State Department posted a faulty map on its website that alters some of the geographical boundaries of Kashmir, the disputed region between India and Pakistan, and depicted some area as part of Pakistan. The region has been a major source of tension between the two South Asian rivals since their partition in 1948.

The offending image has already been taken down, but it can still be seen in reports in the region.

“It did contain some inaccuracies which were associated with the boundaries of some geographic features,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters today. “This was unintentional. We’re going to get the map fixed and put up a fixed map.”

She said U.S. officials have already spoken to Indian officials to explain the mix up, but didn’t know if they had yet spoken with Pakistani officials.

Before you think it’s just a harmless map, remember that an erroneous Google map nearly caused a war between Costa Rica and Nicaragua last November when a Nicaraguan general used it to justify the occupation of an island claimed by Costa Rica.

And a 2008 typo by the U.S. Board of Geographic Names, the official body under the U.S. Interior Department that lists the names and affiliations of locations around the world, mistakenly listed a string of islands claimed by both Japan and South Korea as “undesignated sovereignty” instead of belonging to South Korea, which is longstanding U.S. policy. The mistake led to a diplomatic spat.

President Obama Pardons Five, Including Drug Dealers

NYDN Reports: President Obama has granted the following five pardons and one commutation.

PARDONS:

Lesley Claywood Berry Jr. ­- Loretto, Ky. Offense: Conspiracy to manufacture, possess with intent to distribute, and distribute marijuana. Sentence: District of Minnesota; three years in prison.

Dennis George Bulin – Wesley Chapel, Fla. Offense: Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute in excess of 1,000 pounds of marijuana. Sentence: Middle District of Alabama; five years of probation and $20,000 fine.

Ricky Dale Collett – Annville, Ky. Offense: Aiding and abetting in the manufacture of 61 marijuana plants. Sentence: Eastern District of Kentucky; one year of probation conditioned on 60 days of home detention.

Martin Kaprelian – Park Ridge, Ill. Offense: Conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce; transporting stolen property in interstate commerce; concealing stolen property that was transported in interstate commerce. Sentence: Northern District of Illinois; nine years in prison, five years of probation.

Thomas Paul Ledford – Jonesborough, Tenn. Offense: Conducting and directing an illegal gambling business. Eastern District of Tennessee; one year of probation conditioned on performance of 100 hours of community service.

COMMUTATION: Eugenia Marie Jennings – Alton, Ill. Offense: Distribution of cocaine base. Southern District of Illinois; 262 months in prison, eight years of supervised release, $1,750 fine. Terms of commutation: Prison sentence to expire on Dec. 21, 2011, leaving intact and in effect the eight-year term of supervised release with all its conditions and all other components of the sentence.

Video: Obama’s 1991 ad for ‘Black History Minute’

The Ticket Reports: When Barack Obama gave a rousing speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, it catapulted him to political fame and secured his place as one of the country’s best-known orators.

But a new viral video of the president shows he wasn’t always a natural.

In a 1991 ad for TBS’ “Black History Minute,” the then-Harvard Law Review editor appears a little less comfortable in front of the camera than he is today, and displays his reliance on the teleprompter. You can check out the video for yourself above.

 

Video: Matthews Explains Why President Does Not Deserve Another Term

I didn’t know that MSNBC host Chris Matthews voted for President Bush in 2000. Chris in a different interview explains tha he gave Bush a chance but he messed it up, and apparently Obama too has messed up his chance. The short attack from Matthews takes a mere one in a half minutes but it says a lot.

E-mails: WH Urged Solyndra to Delay Layoff Notices Past 2010 Elections

The National Journal Reports: The Obama administration urged the now-bankrupt solar-energy firm Solyndra and its top investor to hold off announcing planned layoffs in 2010 until after the Nov. 2 elections.

Solyndra received a loan guarantee from the federal stimulus program in September 2009, but it went bankrupt this September—leaving taxpayers on the hook for most of the $535 million initial loan. Struggling financially, the company announced layoffs and plans to consolidate some of its businesses on Nov. 3, 2010, according to press reports at the time.

“They did push very hard for us to hold our announcement of the consolidation to employees and vendors to Nov. 3—oddly, they didn’t give us a reason for that date,” states an October 2010 e-mail exchange between advisers for Argonaut Private Equity, the top investor in Solyndra that was founded by George Kaiser, an Oklahoma oil billionaire who bundled campaign donations for presidential candidate Barack Obama in 2008.

The memo released by Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee states that “several e-mails produced by Argonaut to the Committee reference the fact that the layoff announcement was postponed because of the November 2 elections.” The memo does not include the names of the adviser who wrote the e-mail.

Obama Announces Stricter Financing Standards for Head Start

President Obama visited a schoolhouse in this suburb of Philadelphia on Tuesday to announce stricter financing standards for the government’s Head Start program, which offers preschool training for children from low-income families.

Declaring that investments in early education are critical to the future competitiveness of the United States, Mr. Obama said that the government would, for the first time, require Head Start programs to meet certain standards to qualify for renewal of federal grants.

“If a program isn’t giving children the support they need to be ready for school,” the president told teachers and administrators, squeezed into a small auditorium on folding chairs, “then other organizations will be able to compete for the grant. We will take money from programs that don’t work and put it into programs that do.”

Like many of the stops on Mr. Obama’s itinerary over the last several weeks, this four-hour visit had three ingredients: a politically crucial swing state (Pennsylvania), a sympathetic crowd (educators), and camera-friendly backdrop (3- to 5-year-old children).

Before his speech, Mr. Obama dropped in on a classroom, where he watched several groups of children playing with wood blocks, Legos, puzzles, and toy cars and trucks. Later, he told the crowd that the children “choked me up” because they were “so huggable,” adding that his daughters were “still huggable,” though now 5-foot-9 and 5 feet, respectively.

For the president, who has crisscrossed the country in recent weeks to promote a $447 billion jobs plan that is largely economic stimulus, the visit on Tuesday had a different cast: a pledge to be more discriminating in how the government spends money.

But Mr. Obama renewed his criticism of Republicans in Congress, saying they had voted in favor of cutting the financing of Head Start and the Pell Grant program and had blocked a $35 billion piece of the jobs bill aimed at preventing layoffs of teachers.

“The Republicans in Congress have been trying to gut our investments in education,” Mr. Obama said. He described this initiative as part of a series of unilateral measures that the White House is taking because it does not want to wait for Congress to act.

In fact, many Republicans favor tightening standards for Head Start, and the reforms of the program announced by Mr. Obama on Tuesday date back to the Bush administration. White House officials said the Yeadon Regional Head Start Center, which serves 260 children from Delaware County, was an example of a high-performing center.

Mr. Obama’s criticism came during a week in which the Senate, after blocking several pieces of jobs legislation, seems likely to approve the first elements of the jobs package: tax credits to encourage companies to hire returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan.

“Obviously we look forward to passage of this very important provision of the American Jobs Act, hope it does pass, and the president will sign it into law,” the White House press secretary, Jay Carney, said to reporters traveling with the president on Air Force One.

But the president was not softening his partisan tone, noting that his job-creation ideas could be paid for if Republicans were willing to allow millionaires pay somewhat more in taxes.

“There is no substitute for Congress doing its job,” he said to noisy applause. “If Congress continues to stand only for dysfunction and delay, then I’m going to move ahead without them.”

(Report by the NYT)

Three Year Ago versus Three Years Later

October 31’st, the Republican National Committee released a video ad named “Three Years Later.” The ad outlines how bad things have gotten in the last three years since Obama became President. Just days later, President Obama’s reelection team released a video of its own which focuses much on Obama’s Election Night speech three years ago.
At this time, which video – do you think – has more views? One would think that a President that sends a video to an e-mail list of thirteen million people would sure have many more views than the other side. But at the time of this writing, less than 48,000 people have seen the Obama video, versus almost 84,000 people who saw the RNC video.
Indeed, releasing the RNC video a few days earlier than Obama’s video may have given the Republicans a leg up, but Obama has an e-mail list that the GOP can only dream of haveing. And certainly video views do not indicate who will win or lose an upcoming election. But it is safe to say that the view difference between the two may be proof that enthusiasm among Republicans runs higher than it does among Democrats. Who all know what happened last time that this took place. (see, Midterm Elections, 2010 Edition).

Opinion: WH Refusing to Release Solyndra Documents Shows Guilt

The following is an article by Vin Poupard, a writer for Yahoo!

As a former political/business consultant, I have to laugh at the statements by the White House about the subpoena on Solyndra documents being “overbroad.” This is an argument I have seen before, and have found it is one that is used to stall an investigationor to defer from particular information being found out. The arguments by the White House are more of a statement of guilt than one of persecution.

In times of a congressional investigation, it is the responsibility of the president, the administration and White House workers to turn over all of the information that is requested. Remember the hundreds of boxes that were pulled from the White House during the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinski scandal? This was also the case during the Watergate scandal and during the Church Committee’s investigation of Project MKUltra. The Solyndra investigation is no different.

The White House has said the gathering of information would conflict with President Barack Obama’s ability to meet his duties. Which duties would that be? Right now, all we have seen him do is tour the country and talk about how the Republicans are holding the jobs bill back. Is this a constitutional duty of the president? Where in the Constitution does it state that the president is responsible for blaming a Congress that he is “too busy” to meet with?

The White House refusal of the subpoena and saying it “is a significant intrusion on the Executive Branch interests.” This sounds like a play right out of Dick Chaney’s book. Is the Executive Branch above ever being questioned? Is the president too important to be questioned about a company like Solyndra that was given government money and flopped? Is the president worried about a paper trail?

 If nothing illegal or unethical was done with the Solyndra case, we would see a White House statement to Congress that it can have all of the information it wants without question. If Solyndra and the White House had not been bedmates, Congress would have everything it needed and all the time it needed to go over everything.

Arguments that President Obama is some type of victim to party politics and that the information needed is too broad are stalling statements to try to get the uninformed on President Obama’s side. That reads like an admission to me.

(Source: Yahoo! News )

What Do Orthodox Jews Have in Common with the NRA?

Firing Attorney General Eric Holder! Yup, the National Rifle Association is running now an online ad named “Tell President Obama to Fire Attorney General Eric Holder.The issue is the failed Fast and Furious gun-runner program, which is well explained in the NRA video and the NRA wants Holder out!

As I tweeted two days ago, a leading House Democrat, yes Democrat, claims Holder will be gone by year’s end.

Orthodox Jews in the mean time want Holder out because he is ignoring blatant injustices by federal prosecutors against former Agriprocessors boss Sholom Rubashkin. Holder is not blamed for the 2008 raid since he was not AG at the time. But the subsequent “reduced” yet still outrages request for 25 years for a first time offender, fifty year old, father of ten, white collar issue, under Holder’s watch is unexplainable.

Having someone sit behind bars at the current time due to injustices done by prosecutors before and after Holder took office, is something that some office under Holder should take a look into. Having failed to do so irks the strictly Orthodox Jewish and Hasidic communities, as outlined in the above-linked article.

Here is the NRA video:

Dump Holder!

Am Confused What Obama Said About Welfare Recipients and Jobs

Much focus is placed on President Obama’s statement that we need “Internets” in class rooms. But by viewing a Video at Real Clear Politics from Obama’s Twitter-Hall, I noticed this statement:

“There are work obligations attached to welfare. The vast majority of folks who are getting welfare want to work but can’t find jobs.”

Again? In order to receive welfare you need to have work obligations, such as… having a job, but most people who receive Welfare don’t have jobs? Hmmm.

But Bush was the Dummy.

AP Poll, Stimulus, Jobs, Obama’s Re-Election

Get this, friends:

A ) The AP has a poll which is based on surveying 46% Dems; 29% Repubs, and the rest Indies.

Results? Obama’s approval ratings is at 60 percent; Bush is at 50%. THIS is why AP produced the results with 17-points more Dems in it than Repubs. Were it balanced between the two major parties, W. would be higher than O, which can’t happen because the story-line needs to be that O is flying high due to OBL…

B) In three different post-OBL polls (by Rassmusen, NBC and Gallup) Obama gets 45%, 45% and 43 when asking voters if they will vote for Obama in 2012. So the talk of Obama sailing to a second term due to OBL, is clown hagwash at this time.

C) Obama’s Team said in January 2009 the Stimulus will “create or save” 3.6 million jobs by the end of 2010. People complained that these numbers can be manipulated as to what was/is a ‘saved’ job.

Regardless the wording, Team O predicted that we will have 137.55 million jobs at the end of 2010 if we have the Stimulus, and 133.8 million jobs if we don’t have the Stimulus.

Results? Now in May 2011, the US Economy has 131 million jobs, which is 6.5 million jobs short of that 137.5 jobs we were supposed to have a half year ago.

Can Team O say “things were worse than we expected”? Em, well… The projection was made at the low point of the crisis, so what “worse” is Obama referring?

Important Difference Between a Certificate – vs. Certification – of Live Birth

I am not trying to sort out the broader issue of President Obama being born in the United States or not. However, I do want to point out a small, yet important, point regarding the names of documents flying around this issue; a point that even Donald Trump oversees.
 
President Obama produced a Certification – not a Certificate – of Live Birth. While both are accepted as “birth certificates” in HI, some interesting information would be learned if one reads the websites of Hawaii’s Deportment of Health and of the Department of Hawaiian Homelands:
  • Only the Certificate of Live Birth (the one Obama did not produce) is considered an “original birth certificate.” (read the Homeland website)
  • “A person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii,” is eligible to apply for an amended birth certificate. (Read the Health website)
  • “Although original birth certificates (Certificates of Live Birth) are preferred for their greater detail, the State Department of Health (DOH) no longer issues Certificates of Live Birth.When a request is made for a copy of a birth certificate, the DOH issues a Certification of Live Birth.” (Read the homeland web site)
The above information gives us two options as to why President Obama produced a Certification of Live Birth and not an original birth certificate, aka Certificate of Live Birth. A) Obama lost his original kosher document and therefore the state as a replacement gave him only a Certification document, since they don’t provide anymore copies of the original. B) Obama was born outside of HI, but after his guardians followed through the requirements (a “certified copy of the adoption decree or the certificate of adoption, and payment of fees”), Obama received an amended birth certificate.
 
Mr. Trump, who is very strong on this issue, confuses the difference between the both, saying – such as in his NYT response – that the President produced the Certificate of Live Birth, when in fact it is the Certification of Live Birth that was produced.
 
Regarding the Two Newspapers in Hawaii that placed a Mazel Tove for Obama’s parents to the birth of a son on August 1961, it is relevant to have in mind that Obama has eight half-siblings by four other marriages or relationships between his parents. So go figure to which son the ad was referring. In addition, as WND pointed-out back in July 2009, The Honolulu Star-Bulletin, for example, according to its website, reprints birth information it receives from Hawaii’s Department of Health, which includes Certifications of Birth that foreigners may obtain.
 
Again: I am not suggesting that the President was not born in the USA. However, with the above information at hand, the arguments of the Obama defenders that ‘Obama produced a birth certificate,’ and that ‘there were two ads in the papers,’ become mostly irrelevant.
 
This article was posted at the American Thinker.

Obama’s ‘Removal’ of Dictators

Some on the left claim that Obama has by now removed — without wars — two dictators.

Well, it’s hard to see how Obama ‘removed’ two dictators. The first, in Tunisia, had zero to do with Obama. No one can claim that it was even on Obama’s radar. On the second, Egypt, few can tell which Obama policy or vision brought the revolt. It is only debatable how amateurish  and confusing Obama and his team handled it. Besides, seeing democracy spreading in the ME — if it indeed works out — makes me think that the vision of GW Bush was not totally crazy as many believed 5-7 years ago.  In addition, toppling a regime is not always the tough part. The heavy lifting starts afterwords. On this part, my friends, it is way too early for Obama to take credit on recent Middle East developments.

Is This a Result of the Cairo Speech?

How  long will it  be before  the White  House and their hacks will say that Obama’s Cairo speech of mid-2009 did for the Middle East what Reagan’s “Tear Down This Wall”speech did for Europe?

I don’t know when the Dems will say it, but If they have chutzpa to do so, they should note two things:

1) Reagan’s speech was backed up by actions. He bankrupted the Soviets! It didn’t happen just by a speech, just as we didn’t get to the moon just because Kennedy gave a good speech ten years earlier. Obama did nothing to spread democracy in the ME. He in fact gave more time and recognition to the dictators over there.

2) GW Bush kept on saying that a democracy in Iraq will spread democracy to all of the Middle East. While we don’t see democracies yet, one can rest assure that Bush’s Iraq war, you know the illegal distraction war, has more to do with the democracy winds we see now than any Obama speech. and just as the Berlin Wall and later the collapse of the USSR took place only a year and three years after Reagan took office, the results of the Iraq war are perhaps also seen only now after Bush left office (if the recent ME moves has at all with US policy).

contact: yossi@yossigestetner.com

Obama’s – First Term – Economic Record is Doomed

I don’t care how you spin or cut it. The fact remains and will remain that Obama has a very bad economic record on his watch. No, I won’t list all types of numbers, but just to give you some perspective, get this:

Of the 23 Monthly Unemployment Reports that were released during Obama’s first two years in the White House, 17 of them are 9.5% or above, and only one of them touches the 7% category. The bad news for this nation and Obama is that the President’s policies as have yet to generate economic growth today that should spur hope for jobs to arrive tomorrow.

President Reagan started out his first Unemployment number at 7.7%, similar to where Obama started at 7.7%. Then the rate rose to 10.8% almost two years later, in Nov-Dec 1982. At that time, GDP started to explode in record numbers, pushing down the UR from 10.8% after the midterm elections, to 8.3% twelve months later. Does anyone here think that the unemployment Rate in a year from now will be lower by 2.5 points as it dropped in 1983? I don’t think so. And THIS is why I say Obama’s economic legacy for his current term is doomed!

Sign up here to receive my posts FREE via E-Mail. Only your e-mail address is needed. It takes 42 seconds. Posts arrive only once a day.

Let us Look at Obama’s “BIG Wins”

President Obama was busy signing legislation all week – legislations that he wanted, and as such the media describes it as BIG wins for him. However, let’s have some context here: 

START with Russia is indeed a win in the context of passing a bill despite opposition of lead Republicans. However, if the policy will come back and bite America, there is nothing to be excited about it. Obama “won” when he got his Stimulus in Feb 2009 and later the Health Care Reform (HCR) bill. However, both of them came with a heavy price for his party this last November because the economy was/is still in the dumps, and HCR is bringing havoc on American business, workers, and policy holders.

The Tax Bill compromise was a mere ten days ago viewed by Dems and media as a flap for Obama since “he gave” too much for the Republicans. Therefore, I wonder, how it got onto the “big win” list two weeks later.

DREAM Act stayed a dream. No win here.

Spending Bill of $1.1 trillion did not pass. Worse, the bill that passed in its place prohibits Obama from using Federal Funds to House Gitmo detainees on the continental USA. This means Gitmo is still open for business a year passed Obama’s deadline that he pledged to be closed.

What Else: Nutrition Bill? Food-Safety Bill? Granted, it passed and signed. But not every signature a President gives on a bill can get the title “Big Win.” Same goes with the 9/11 Health Bill. Republicans were not in principle against it. They disagreed on its funding. Schumer/Gillibrand addressed some of these concerns and it was passed. Very nice.

DADT repeal is indeed a win, but perhaps limited, since most Americans – while supporting its repeal – are not SO obsessed with it, one way or another, as are some liberal activist who will anyway explode on Obama after his next compromise with the Republican House.

FCC 3-2 vote giving Obama power to dictate the internet was made possible by one Republican seat on the Commission that is vacant for a long time, which by proxy undercuts the initial intent of having the FCC split between two parties to limit its ability of passing crazy regulations. Keeping a seat of your opponent vacant in order to have the majority vote for an Internet power grab, reminds people of Hugo Shavez who also recently got the power from an “independent” government body to dictate the internet. Yeah, BIG Win! When are Shavez and Obama popping the Champagne bottle on this one?

All in all, I am still wondering what are Obama’s BIG WINS that I can’t seem to escape everywhere I read.

Sign up here to receive my posts FREE via E-Mail. Only your e-mail address is needed. It takes 42 seconds. Posts arrive only once a day.

Republicans Welcome Obama’s Line of “Not Going Back” with the Economy

As it is noted in public records, the economy gained 200,000 jobs a month; the unemployment rate was at 4.5%; the budget deficit below $170 billion, and the Dow was a few thousands points higher, when the Republicans last controlled both Houses of Congress in 2006.

But after months and months of the Democrats in control of Capital Hill with Obama as a voting member of the Majority Party in the Senate, hell broke out in the American economy – as we all sadly know.

Therefore, Republicans are happy when President Obama says repeatedly that “the last thing we can afford to do is go back to the policies that got us into this mess in the first place!”

Republicans say, ‘indeed. We cannot afford these policies! Democrats need to go! Almost all of them voted with Pelosi/Reid and Senator/President Obama on all their budgets and policies, which gave us a MESS of which certain things became only worse since the beginning of 2009, such as the amount jobs lost in 2009 which was worse than 2008, and foreclosures which broke a record in 2009.’

This would be satire if not for the truth of it…